If I take a sheet of paper of a given size, my drawing will have a necessary relationship to its format. A work of art must be harmonious in its entirety: any superfluous detail would replace some other essential detail in the mind of the spectator.Ĭomposition, the aim of which should be expression, is modified according to the surface to be covered. Everything that is not useful in the picture is, it follows, harmful. In a picture every part will be visible and will play its appointed role, whether it be principal or secondary. Composition is the art of arranging in a decorative manner the diverse elements at the painter’s command to express his feelings. The entire arrangement of my picture is expressive: the place occupied by the figures, the empty spaces around them, the proportions, everything has its share. The entire arrangement of my picture is expressive: the place occupied by the figures, the empty spaces around them, the proportions, everything has its share.Įxpression, for me, does not reside in passions glowing in a human face or manifested by violent movement. I am unable to distinguish between the feeling I have about life and my way of translating it.Įxpression, for me, does not reside in passions glowing in a human face or manifested by violent movement. But the thought of a painter must not be considered as separate from his pictorial means, for the thought is worth no more than its expression by the means, which must be more complete (and by complete I do not mean complicated) the deeper is his thought. Sometimes it has been conceded that I have a certain technical ability but that all the same my ambition is limited, and does not go beyond the purely visual satisfaction such as can be obtained from looking at a picture. What I am after, above all, is expression. Thus I risk being accused of injustice towards painters whose aims and results I best understand, or whose accomplishments I most appreciate, whereas I will have used them as examples, not to establish my superiority over them, but to show more clearly, through what they have done, what I am attempting to do. My destination is always the same but I work out a different route to get there.įinally, if I mention the name of this or that artist it will be to point out how our manners differ, and it may seem that I am belittling his work. I do not repudiate any of my paintings but there is not one of them that I would not redo differently, if I had it to redo. Or rather, my basic idea has not changed, but my thought has evolved, and my modes of expression have followed my thoughts. I feel very strongly the tie between my earlier and my recent works, but I do not think exactly the way I thought yesterday. Personally, I shall simply try to state my feelings and aspirations as a painter without worrying about the writing.īut now I foresee the danger of appearing to contradict myself. However, such painters as Signac, Desvallieres, Denis, Blanche, Guerin and Bernard have written on such matters and been well received by various periodicals. As a matter of fact, I am fully aware that a painter”s best spokesman is his work. In the first place, knowing that many people like to think of painting as an appendage of literature and therefore want it to express not general ideas suited to pictorial means, but specifically literary ideas, I fear that one will look with astonishment upon the painter who ventures to invade the domain of the literary man. Here you will find photos and information about our latest projects in the art room and out and about in the halls of Deerfield Township School. In addition, I will post fun extra credit art projects that can be done at home and on long vacations.A painter who addresses the public not just in order to present his works, but to reveal some of his ideas on the art of painting, exposes himself to several dangers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |